Radicalisation

Radicalisation

Since several years, Joel Vos has been studying the process of radicalisation of individuals in three intersecting groups:

(1) violent extremism and terrorism,

(2) young people and gangs,

(3) politicians, and victims of political oppression.

In 2025, several of Vos’ key articles will be published on this topic, including a systematic review of all 667 studies on the relationship between meaning in life and radicalisation, and analyses of 1440 cases of violent extremism, and 362 individuals convicted for violent extremism and terrorism in the Netherlands. This research builds on his previous systematic analyses of meaning in life in politics, economics and social movements (Vos, 2020, The Economics of Meaning in Life. UPP.) This page provides some key findings and applications of his research on radicalisation and meaning in life.

Context

The European Union and global society face unprecedented challenges, including geopolitical conflicts, economic instability, climate change, and post-pandemic effects (Vos, 2022, 2021, 2020; Vos, Roberts & Davies, 2019). Recent studies show concerning global trends with a 22% increase in terrorism-related fatalities (ACLED, 2024), 68% of young people supporting confrontational political actions (Global Activism Trends Institute, 2022), and 18% of people living in conflict or war (ACLED, 2024). In European countries, there is a significant increase in youth gang involvement, with, for example, a 16% increase in Stockholm (ISRD4, 2024), Notable European security events include the December 2023 incident near the Eiffel Tower in Paris, where an individual with documented extremist ties fatally attacked a German visitor and wounded two others; the October 2023 incident in Brussels, where an ISIS sympathiser fatally shot two Swedish sports supporters; the December 2023 multinational operation that detained five neo-Nazi members suspected of orchestrating violence and spreading radical materials. Subsequently, these trends reinforce each other (see Figure on the right). Understandably, these challenges have prompted international responses through EU and UN goals (SDG16, SDG4) that prioritise research fostering societal resilience and empowering young people.

The MOSAIC framework

How do people try to realise the meanings they envision, and how do they cope with meanings they cannot realise? And how could this lead to radicalisation in violent extremists, young people, radicalised politicians and state violence? This is what the MOSAIC framework describes. This section gives a high-level overview.

The MOSAIC framework centres on the experience of unrealized meanings in life and people’s responses to these. When individuals encounter barriers to realizing their envisioned meaningful life—often caused by various contemporary societal challenges—they may experience intense physical and emotional responses. These can include disappointment, distress, helplessness, and frustration, particularly when repeated attempts to live a meaningful life and create a meaningful world fail. Their subsequent actions depend on how they appraise these failures, often through an unconscious and emotion-driven process. This appraisal primarily involves evaluating the extent to which the fulfilment of one’s envisioned meaning is threatened or lost due to constraints in their personal situation, social networks, and societal structures. Secondarily, individuals assess their resources to cope with these challenges, such as intrapersonal skills, social network support, just and stable societal structures. Tertiary appraisal involves examining how they can still live a meaningful life despite these threats and with available resources.

Thus, the model posits three key components: envisioned meanings, realised meanings, and the experiences and appraisal of unfulfilled meanings. Any following decisions and behaviours are likely to align with these three, as individuals may try new methods to realise their meanings (e.g., improve skills, or use alternative methods), re-envision their meanings (e.g., change goals, priorities, examples or types of meaning), or re-appraise their situation (e.g., attribute the failure to themselves, their social network, or societal structures). This meaning-making process occurs within a complex societal framework, where societal structures, social networks, and personal circumstances influence meaning-making. These influences shape how meanings are realised, envisioned, and appraised, for example, through socialisation, education, and media. This dynamic interplay can lead to cycles of mutual radicalisation amongst groups, from extremist organisations to political entities.

The persistent inability to realise one’s meanings may trigger a process of radicalisation, particularly when an individual attributes their failures to structural societal constraints, such as their group’s social marginalisation and injustice. Radicalisation means that individuals progressively alter the methods they use to realise their meanings, the meanings and goals they (re)envision, and their (re)experiences and (re)appraisal of the situation. Radicalisation often starts with a shift in the approach of individuals trying to make meaning in life, possibly as a response to having failed in their previous approach. This is understandable: if you cannot fulfil your meanings on your own, you may look for others who can. Therefore, individuals may seek guidance from radical social networks/groups who present themselves as knowing how to realise a meaningful life and world. The radical network may offer a reappraisal/narrative that explains why their previous attempts to live a meaningful life and create a meaningful world have failed. Networks may instantly fulfil an individual’s need for meaning by giving a sense of identity (i.e., self-oriented type of meaning), belonging, status, and appreciation (social type), as well as feeling part of something bigger than oneself (large type). Whereas individuals may previously have failed to achieve these types of meaning, they may feel that this network can give this. Possibly influenced by the social dynamics of these radical networks and their radical narratives, individuals may develop a narrow, passionate focus on abstract ideals and values that align with their group’s meanings, such as religious fundamentalism, the ideal of white supremacy in far-right groups, or their gang’s survival and symbolic dominance. For many extremists, this seems to involve a fusion between their personal and network meanings. Individuals build their entire sense of meaning in life around abstract ideals, while dismissing other meanings, such as other social connections, materialistic, hedonistic and self-oriented meanings. These shifts may motivate goal-oriented strategising and planning of radical actions, such as violent extremism, gangs, political radicalisation and state violence.

Thus, the MOSAIC framework places the following meaning-making variables at the heart of radicalisation in the three themes: envisioned types of meaning, realised types of meaning, experiences and appraisal of unrealised meanings, responses to unrealised meanings through realising, re-appraisal and re-envisioning meanings, approaches to meaning, involvement in extremist groups/networks, influential societal and personal factors.

This explanation is based on: Vos, J. (2025). Measuring Meaning in Life at Macro and Micro-level: Real-world Implications and Future Directions (Types, Approaches, and Number of Envisioned and Realized Meanings in Life). Journal of Positive Psychology. (In print.)

Comprehensive Analysis of Rickard Andersson’s Radicalization Process:

understanding the causes of the mass shooting at Campus Risbergska in Örebro, Sweden, at 5 February 2025

Semi-journalistic text

The Descent into Darkness: Understanding Rickard Andersson’s Path to Extremism and the Quest for a Meaning-Oriented Society

On February 4, 2025, the quiet city of Örebro, Sweden, was shaken to its core. Rickard Andersson, a 35-year-old local resident, walked into Campus Risbergska, an adult education center, and opened fire. The attack left at least ten people dead and several others injured, marking it as one of the worst mass shootings in Swedish history. But how did a man, once described as a quiet loner, transform into a violent extremist?

This tragedy has forced us to confront uncomfortable questions about radicalization, mental health, and the very fabric of our society. By understanding Andersson’s journey, we may find ways to prevent such horrors in the future and reflect on how we can build a more meaningful, inclusive society for all.

 

The Making of a Radical: A Five-Phase Journey

Recent research using the MOSAIC (Meaning-Oriented Social And Individual Change) model, developed by Dr. Joel Vos and Christine Namdar, offers a compelling framework to understand Andersson’s radicalization. This model, based on an extensive review of 667 scientific studies and validated in 1442 cases, identifies five distinct phases in the radicalization process. Let’s explore Andersson’s descent through these phases:

 

Phase 1. Pre-radicalization

Rickard Andersson’s story begins in Örebro, a city in transition. Once an industrial hub, Örebro was shifting towards a service-oriented economy. This change, coupled with increasing economic inequality in Sweden since the mid-1980s, set the stage for Andersson’s struggles.

Born in 1989 as Jonas Simon, Andersson’s early life was marked by academic difficulties. He attended Navets skolen for nine years without passing a single subject. Later, at Wadköpings utbildningscenter, he managed to pass only three subjects, failing seven others. These persistent academic failures likely planted seeds of inadequacy and resentment.

A relative described Andersson’s childhood neighborhood as “prosperous,” highlighting a stark contrast between his surroundings and his personal circumstances. This disparity may have fueled a sense of relative deprivation, a key factor in many radicalization cases.

As a child, Andersson had friends and participated in group activities. However, over time, he became increasingly isolated. This gradual withdrawal from social connections would prove crucial in his later radicalization.

 

Phase 2. Searching for meaning

The second phase of Andersson’s radicalization was marked by significant life events and a search for new sources of meaning. In 2017, at the age of 28, he changed his name from Jonas Simon to Rickard Andersson, taking his father’s pre-marriage surname. This act suggests a desire for a new identity, possibly an attempt to break from his troubled past.

Andersson’s struggles continued into adulthood. He moved out of his parents’ home in 2010 at age 21 but failed to establish a stable life. From 2014 onwards, he had no taxable income, never held a state or municipal job, and never took out student loans. This long-term unemployment likely intensified his feelings of alienation and worthlessness.

Adding to his frustrations, Andersson was repeatedly refused military service. For many young men, military service can provide a sense of purpose and belonging. Its denial may have further fueled Andersson’s resentment towards societal institutions.

During this phase, Andersson likely began exploring alternative ideologies that could explain his perceived failures and provide a new sense of purpose. The internet, with its vast array of extremist content, may have played a crucial role in this exploration.

 

Phase 3. Finding meaning through radical networks and ideologies

As Andersson’s isolation deepened, he appears to have immersed himself in extremist ideologies, likely through online communities. While specific details of his online activities are not available, research suggests that such communities often play a crucial role in reinforcing radical beliefs.

Family members noticed a marked deterioration in Andersson’s mental state during this period. One relative reported, “He didn’t like gatherings. It irritated him. He wasn’t with his parents for Christmas. He wasn’t mentally well.” This withdrawal from family and increased irritability are common signs of radicalization.

It’s during this phase that Andersson may have begun to view himself as part of a larger ideological struggle. Extremist narratives often provide a sense of significance to individuals who feel marginalized by society. For Andersson, these narratives likely offered an explanation for his struggles and a path to redemption.

 

Phase 4. Commitment to radical meanings

As Andersson’s radicalization progressed, his worldview likely became increasingly rigid and aligned with extremist ideologies. This phase is characterized by a fusion of personal grievances with broader extremist narratives.

Interestingly, it was during this period that Andersson enrolled in several math courses at Risbergska adult education centre, with the last one in May 2021. This return to education might have been an attempt to address his past academic failures. However, it also familiarized him with the location that would later become the target of his attack.

The planning and preparation for the attack likely provided Andersson with a sense of purpose and control that had been lacking in his life. In extremist ideologies, violence is often framed as a noble act of resistance or revolution. For Andersson, the idea of carrying out an attack may have seemed like a way to finally achieve significance and make a lasting impact on the world.

 

Phase 5. Preparation and execution of violent actions

The final phase of Andersson’s radicalization culminated in the tragic events of February 4, 2025. On that day, he arrived at Campus Risbergska around lunchtime, carrying a guitar-like case. He entered a bathroom, where he changed into military-style clothing and armed himself with at least one weapon from the case.

Andersson’s preparation was meticulous. He carried three guns and a knife, indicating extensive planning and a high level of commitment to his extremist beliefs. The choice of military-style clothing suggests he saw himself as a soldier in an ideological war.

The attack itself was brutal and indiscriminate. At least ten people were killed, and six others were taken to the hospital with serious injuries. Eyewitness accounts suggest that Andersson spared certain individuals while targeting others, hinting at a possible ideological motive behind his choices.

Police exchanged fire with Andersson during the incident, and he was ultimately found dead at the scene, likely from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The attack sent shockwaves through Sweden and beyond, prompting soul-searching about the roots of extremism in society.

 

The Role of Meaning-Making in Radicalization

The case of Rickard Andersson highlights the crucial role that meaning-making plays in the radicalization process. Throughout his journey, we can observe how his search for meaning and significance drove him towards increasingly extreme beliefs and actions.

In the pre-radicalization phase, Andersson’s academic failures and social isolation created a void in his sense of purpose and belonging. This lack of meaningful engagement with society left him vulnerable to alternative narratives that promised significance and clarity.

During the meaning search phase, Andersson’s attempts to find new sources of meaning – through changing his name and seeking military service – reflect a desperate attempt to redefine his identity and find a place in society. When these efforts failed, he became more susceptible to extremist ideologies that offered simple explanations for his struggles and a clear path to significance.

The meaning immersion phase saw Andersson fully embracing extremist narratives as a way to make sense of his life experiences. These ideologies likely provided him with a sense of purpose, a clear enemy to blame for his problems, and a community (albeit a toxic one) that validated his feelings of resentment and alienation.

In the meaning commitment phase, Andersson’s adherence to extremist beliefs became a central part of his identity. The planning of the attack gave him a sense of mission and importance that he had long been seeking. This commitment to a radical cause filled the void left by his inability to find meaning through conventional societal channels.

The final, tragic outcome of Andersson’s radicalization process demonstrates the dangerous potential of misdirected meaning-making. When individuals are unable to find positive sources of meaning and purpose in their lives, they may turn to destructive ideologies and actions as a way to assert their significance and leave a mark on the world.

 

Reflections on Creating a Meaning-Oriented Society

The case of Rickard Andersson serves as a stark reminder of the importance of fostering a society that provides ample opportunities for individuals to find meaning and purpose in constructive ways. Drawing from the concept of a meaning-oriented society, as explored in Dr. Joel Vos’s book The Economics of Meaning in Life, we may identify several key areas for societal improvement:

 

  1. Education Reform

A meaning-oriented education would focus on helping students  how to live a meaningful life despite life’s inevitable challenges, discover and develop their unique strengths and interests, while also teaching critical thinking skills to evaluate information and resist extremist narratives. It would foster emotional intelligence and social skills to build resilience and healthy relationships, and incorporate discussions about meaning, purpose, and ethics across the curriculum.relationships

 

  1. Economic Inclusivity

Andersson’s long-term unemployment and financial instability likely contributed to his sense of alienation. A meaning-oriented economy would prioritize creating meaningful work opportunities that allow individuals to contribute to society. It would implement universal basic income or similar programs to provide a safety net, promote economic policies that reduce inequality and increase social mobility, and encourage businesses to prioritize employee well-being and social responsibility.

 

  1. Mental Health Support

The deterioration of Andersson’s mental state underscores the importance of accessible mental health services. A meaning-oriented approach to mental health would include destigmatizing mental health issues and promoting help-seeking behaviors. It would integrate meaning-centered therapies into mainstream mental health care, provide community-based support programs for individuals at risk of isolation, and offer crisis intervention services that address both immediate needs and long-term meaning-making.

 

  1. Community Building

Andersson’s increasing isolation highlights the need for strong community connections. Initiatives to foster a meaning-oriented community could include creating public spaces that encourage social interaction and shared experiences. Supporting local organizations that bring people together around common interests, implementing intergenerational programs to foster mentorship and knowledge sharing, and promoting volunteer opportunities that allow individuals to contribute to their communities would all be crucial components.

 

  1. Media Literacy and Digital Citizenship

Given the likely role of online radicalization in Andersson’s case, it’s crucial to address digital spaces. A meaning-oriented approach to media and technology would involve teaching comprehensive media literacy skills from an early age and encouraging responsible social media use and critical evaluation of online information. It would support the development of online communities that promote positive values and constructive dialogue, and implement policies to combat online extremism while protecting free speech.

 

  1. Inclusive Narratives of National Identity

Extremist ideologies often exploit feelings of cultural threat or displacement. To counter this, we should focus on promoting inclusive narratives of national identity that celebrate diversity. Acknowledging historical injustices while focusing on shared values and common goals, encouraging intercultural dialogue and understanding, and highlighting stories of individuals from diverse backgrounds who have positively contributed to society would all contribute to a more inclusive national narrative.

 

  1. Meaning-Centered Policy Making

At a broader level, governments should incorporate meaning-oriented thinking into policy development. This would involve evaluating policies not just on economic impact, but on their potential to enhance citizens’ sense of meaning and purpose. Involving diverse stakeholders in the policy-making process to ensure a range of perspectives, implementing “meaning impact assessments” for major policy initiatives, and prioritizing long-term societal well-being over short-term gains would be key aspects of this approach.

 

Conclusion: A Call for Collective Action

The tragedy at Campus Risbergska is a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of radicalization. But it’s also an opportunity for reflection and action. By understanding Rickard Andersson’s journey through the lens of meaning-making, we can work towards creating a society that provides meaningful alternatives to extremism.

This requires a collective effort. Policymakers need to address systemic inequalities and provide robust support systems. Educators must help students find purpose beyond academic achievement. Mental health professionals need resources and support to reach those in need. Communities must create spaces for connection and belonging. And as individuals, we all have a role to play in fostering a society where everyone can find meaning and significance in constructive ways.

The path forward is not easy, but it’s necessary. By learning from this tragedy and taking concrete steps to build a more inclusive, supportive, and meaningful society, we can honor the victims of the Risbergska attack and work towards a future where such horrors become increasingly rare.

In the end, the story of Rickard Andersson is not just about one man’s descent into extremism. It’s a call to action for all of us to reflect on how we can create a world where every individual has the opportunity to lead a meaningful life, contribute positively to society, and find purpose without resorting to violence or hate. It’s a challenging task, but one that’s essential for the safety, well-being, and flourishing of our communities and nations.

By embracing a meaning-oriented approach to societal organization, we can address the root causes of alienation, resentment, and extremism. We can create a world where individuals like Rickard Andersson are supported, valued, and guided towards positive sources of meaning long before they consider turning to violence. This is not just a utopian ideal, but a practical necessity in our increasingly complex and interconnected world.

The journey towards a meaning-oriented society will require sustained effort, open dialogue, and a willingness to challenge entrenched systems and beliefs. But the potential rewards – a more resilient, compassionate, and fulfilling society for all – make it a goal worth pursuing with all our collective energy and creativity.

Academic text

Abstract
The tragic mass shooting at Campus Risbergska in Örebro, Sweden, by Rickard Andersson, underscores the urgent need for innovative approaches to prevent radicalization. This analysis, using the evidence-based MOSAIC (Meaning-Oriented Social And Individual Change) model of radicalisation, offers invaluable insights into Andersson’s journey from meaning-making failures and social isolation to violent extremism. The analyses with the MOSAIC model reveals five distinct phases of radicalization, from pre-radicalization to extremist outcomes, providing a roadmap for early intervention. Andersson’s case highlights critical factors, including economic inequality, academic struggles, and long-term unemployment, that contributed to his sense of being unable to live a meaningful life and contribute to a meaningful world. His struggles to find meaning led to his immersion in extremist white supremecist ideologies, and ultimate commitment to a radical narrative that culminated in the devastating attack. By understanding the role of meaning-making in radicalization, local authorities and governments have a unique opportunity to implement targeted prevention strategies. These may include meaning-oriented education programs, community engagement initiatives, and improved mental health support systems. Investing in this approach can play a crucial role in building resilient communities and preventing future tragedies, transforming this devastating event into a catalyst for positive societal change.

 

Aim and Methodology

This text aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Rickard Andersson’s radicalization process leading to the tragic mass shooting at Campus Risbergska in Örebro, Sweden, on February 4, 2025. By applying the MOSAIC (Meaning-Oriented Social And Individual Change) model, we seek to offer insights into the complex interplay of personal, social, and societal factors that contributed to this act of violent extremism. This analysis is intended to inform policymakers and relevant authorities about the nuanced nature of radicalization processes and to provide evidence-based recommendations for prevention and intervention strategies.

The MOSAIC model, developed by Vos and Namdar (2025) is a comprehensive framework for understanding radicalization processes, based on a systematic review of 667 scientific studies, validated in 1442 cases. The MOSAIC model identifies five distinct phases in the radicalization process:

  1. Meaning foundations (Pre-radicalization)
  2. Meaning search (Initial exposure and explorations)
  3. Meaning immersion (Engagement with radical network)
  4. Meaning commitment (Solidification of radical narrative)
  5. Extremist outcomes (Preparation and execution)

Within each phase, the model examines how an individual envisions a meaningful life and world, how they try to realise this, and how they experience, appraise and respond to unrealised meanings, under influence from society, social networks, and personal circumstances. As individuals may experience repeated failure to realize the meaningful life and world they had envisioned, they may shift towards using more radical methods to realize their meanings, develop more radical envisioned meanings, and radicalise reappraise the cause and solutions to their failures.

This article was written with the help of AI Claude that was trained with the MOSAIC model (Vos & Namdar, 2025), which serves as an example of how the model and the app could be used to quickly analyze and respond to emerging cases of radicalization. By applying this model to Rickard Andersson’s case, we can gain valuable insights into the factors that contributed to his radicalization and identify potential intervention points.

 

Analysis of Rickard Andersson’s Radicalization Process

 

Phase 1: Meaning foundations (Pre-radicalization)

Society

  • Andersson grew up in Örebro, Sweden, a mid-sized city undergoing economic transition from industrial to service-oriented sectors.
  • Sweden experienced increasing economic inequality since the mid-1980s (OECD, 2015), potentially creating a sense of relative deprivation.
  • Changes in the labor market, including the decline of blue-collar union influence (Svallfors, 2016), may have contributed to feelings of disenfranchisement.
  • Andersson grew up in what a relative described as a “prosperous area” (Avaz.ba, 2025), suggesting a contrast between his personal circumstances and his surroundings.

Network

  • As a child, Andersson was part of a group of boys who played and gamed together (Aftonbladet, 2025), indicating initial social connections.
  • Over time, he became increasingly isolated, described as a “recluse” and “loner” by relatives (BBC News, 2025; The Independent, 2025).

Person

  • Born in 1989 as Jonas Simon to Swedish parents (Expressen, 2025).
  • Struggled academically, attending Navets skolen for nine years without passing a single subject (Aftonbladet, 2025).
  • Later attended Wadköpings utbildningscenter but never completed high school, passing only history, psychology, and an aesthetic subject while failing seven others (Aftonbladet, 2025).
  • Moved out of his parents’ home in 2010 at age 21 (Aftonbladet, 2025).
  • Had no taxable income since 2014, never held a state or municipal job, and never took out student loans (Expressen, 2025).
  • Had possible mental health issues, as mentioned by relatives (BBC News, 2025; The Independent, 2025).

Envisioned meanings

  • Likely envisioned a life of academic achievement, stable employment, and social connections within Swedish society.

Realized meanings

  • Academic failure and social disconnection.
  • Sense of not meeting societal expectations.

Unrealized meanings experiences & appraisal

  • Expectations of success and belonging in Swedish society were not met.
  • The gap between his envisioned life and reality likely led to feelings of frustration and resentment.

 

Phase 2: Meaning search (Initial exposure and explorations)

Trigger event

  • Repeated rejection from military service (The Independent, 2025).
  • Long-term unemployment, with no taxable income since 2014 (Expressen, 2025).
  • Changed his name to Rickard Andersson in 2017, possibly indicating a desire for a new identity (Expressen, 2025).

Unrealized meanings experiences & appraisal

  • Intensified feelings of failure and rejection by societal institutions.
  • The continued disconnect between his desired life and reality may have intensified feelings of alienation and anger.

Reappraise via open-minded exploration of perspectives

  • Possibly began exploring alternative ideologies or worldviews online.
  • Andersson likely reappraised societal issues through the lens of extremist narratives, viewing immigration and cultural changes as threats to his identity.

Re-envision meaning by exploring new examples, types and priorities

  • May have started considering extremist narratives that offered simple explanations for his struggles.
  • Andersson probably began re-envisioning his role as a potential “defender” of his perceived threatened culture or identity.

Realize meanings via adaptive coping

  • Obtained a hunting license and legally owned multiple hunting rifles (The Independent, 2025; SVT, 2025).
  • Was interested in ice hockey and enjoyed driving, considering becoming a truck driver at one point (Expressen, 2025).

 

Phase 3: Meaning immersion (Engagement with radical network)

Unrealized meanings experiences & appraisal

  • Continued unemployment and social isolation likely intensified feelings of alienation and anger.
  • Mental health problems, combined with social isolation, likely intensified his search for meaning and significance (Bhui et al., 2014).

Reappraise by conforming to network narrative

  • Likely began viewing societal issues entirely through an extremist lens, reinforcing his radicalized worldview.
  • Sweden’s political discourse increasingly focused on immigration-related issues, potentially reinforcing Andersson’s grievances.
  • Media framing of integration challenges may have contributed to a polarized public debate (Rydgren & van der Meiden, 2019).

Re-envision by focusing on social and abstract meanings

  • Andersson’s vision likely shifted towards a role as a significant actor in a larger ideological struggle, possibly seeing himself as a “warrior” or “martyr” for his cause.
  • Probably re-envisioned violent action as a means to achieve significance and make a lasting impact on society.

Realize meanings (mainly social) via network

  • While specific information about Andersson’s involvement with extremist networks is not available, research suggests that online communities often play a crucial role in reinforcing radical beliefs (Koehler, 2022).
  • Deeper engagement with extremist content and potentially like-minded individuals online may have provided a sense of purpose and significance.

Network social dynamic

  • Family members noticed a deterioration in his mental state, reporting that “He didn’t like gatherings. It irritated him. He wasn’t with his parents for Christmas. He wasn’t mentally well” (Avaz.ba, 2025).
  • Although Andersson acted alone physically, his radicalization process may have been reinforced by online extremist communities or echo chambers that validated his beliefs (Koehler, 2022)

 

Phase 4: Meaning commitment (Solidification of radical narrative)

Unrealized meanings experiences & appraisal

  • The persistent gap between his radicalized vision and his actual life circumstances may have fueled a desire for drastic action.
  • The final disconnect between his extremist vision and the reality of his actions may have manifested as a sense of inevitability or destiny.

Reappraise via fusion of personal meanings with network narrative and/or abstract ideals

  • Andersson likely reappraised past events and current societal issues entirely through an extremist lens, reinforcing his radicalized worldview.
  • He likely reappraised the value of human life, justifying potential victims as necessary sacrifices for his perceived greater cause.

Re-envision by narrowing to abstract meanings

  • In the final stages, Andersson re-envisioned the attack as his defining life act, a way to permanently inscribe his significance in history and society.
  • Andersson’s envisioned meanings likely centered on becoming a “hero” or “avenger” through a violent act, seeing it as a way to achieve ultimate significance.

Realize meanings via goal-oriented strategizing & planning

  • Enrolled in several math courses at Risbergska adult education centre, with the last one in May 2021 (Aftonbladet, 2025), potentially influencing his later target selection.
  • The planning and preparation for the attack may have provided a sense of purpose and control previously lacking in his life.
  • Began planning the attack, including the acquisition and preparation of weapons.

 

Phase 5: Extremist outcomes (Preparation and execution)

Extremist attitude

  • Developed a complete embrace of a radical ideology that justified violence as a means to achieve significance (Kruglanski et al., 2019).
  • The choice of an adult education center as a target might indicate resentment towards educational institutions and what they represent in terms of social integration (SVT, 2025; The Guardian, 2025).

Extremist intentions

  • Decided to carry out a mass shooting at Campus Risbergska, a place he once attended.
  • The possession of legal firearms and extensive preparation, including changing into military-style clothing before the attack, indicate a high level of commitment to his extremist beliefs (The Independent, 2025).

Extremist actions

  • On February 4, 2025, Andersson arrived at Campus Risbergska around lunchtime, walked around briefly, then entered a bathroom with a guitar-like case (Aftonbladet, 2025).
  • He changed into green military-style clothing and took out at least one weapon from the case (Aftonbladet, 2025; The Independent, 2025).
  • Andersson carried three guns and a knife during the attack, indicating extensive preparation (The Independent, 2025).
  • At least ten people were killed, and Andersson was found dead at the scene (ITV News, 2025).
  • Six people were taken to the emergency department at Örebro University Hospital, with five described as seriously injured (ITV News, 2025).
  • According to anonymous sources, Andersson reportedly spared certain individuals while shooting others (TV2, 2025).
  • Police exchanged fire with Andersson during the incident (The Independent, 2025).

Attack Aftermath

  • The attack is considered Sweden’s worst-ever mass shooting (The Guardian, 2025).
  • Police conducted a large-scale search operation at Andersson’s residence, using drones and heavily armed officers (The Independent, 2025).
  • Swedish King Carl Gustaf and Queen Silvia, along with Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, visited the site and attended a remembrance service (The Guardian, 2025).
  • All government buildings and royal palaces in Sweden flew flags at half-mast from 9am on February 5, 2025, to commemorate the shooting (The Independent, 2025)

 

Key Processes Throughout Radicalization
1. Narrowing of meaning types: Andersson appears to have focused increasingly on abstract types of meaning, dismissing self-oriented, hedonistic, or materialistic types (Vos, 2023).
2. Shift in approaches to meaning: There was likely a move towards a more rigid goal-oriented approach focused on carrying out his attack, as evidenced by his extensive preparation and choice of multiple weapons (The Independent, 2025; Vos, 2023).
3. Reappraisal: Andersson reinterpreted his life experiences and societal events through the lens of his extremist ideology, possibly viewing his unemployment and social isolation as justifications for violence (Park, 2010).
4. Practical realization skills: He developed new skills aligned with his extremist goals, such as planning the attack, changing into military-style clothing, and using multiple weapons (Kruglanski et al., 2019; The Independent, 2025).
5. Re-envisioning meanings: Personal and societal meanings were reconstructed to fit his new radical worldview, potentially seeing violence as a means to achieve significance or revenge against perceived societal injustices (Park & Folkman, 1997).

 

Summary of the Radicalization Process
Rickard Andersson’s journey from a socially isolated individual to a mass shooter illustrates the complex interplay of personal, social, and societal factors in the radicalization process. His academic struggles, long-term unemployment, and social isolation created vulnerabilities that, when combined with broader societal changes and exposure to extremist ideologies, led to a progressive embrace of violent extremism. The MOSAIC model helps us understand how Andersson’s quest for personal significance and meaning, in the context of perceived societal injustices and reinforced by online echo chambers, ultimately resulted in the tragic attack at Campus Risbergska.

 

Missed Opportunities in Andersson’s Case: A MOSAIC Model Perspective

Based on the MOSAIC model analysis of Rickard Andersson’s radicalization process, several critical opportunities for intervention were missed:

 

  1. Early Academic Intervention:

– Authorities failed to address Andersson’s severe academic struggles at Navets skolen, where he spent nine years without passing a single subject. A comprehensive educational support system could have provided personalized learning plans and additional tutoring to prevent his academic failure and subsequent feelings of inadequacy.

 

  1. Vocational Guidance:

– Despite Andersson’s interest in ice hockey and driving, there was no apparent effort to guide him towards vocational training or alternative career paths. Career counseling services could have helped him find meaningful employment or educational opportunities aligned with his interests.

 

  1. Mental Health Support:

– The reported mental health issues mentioned by relatives were not adequately addressed. Regular mental health screenings and accessible services could have identified and treated potential problems early on, potentially preventing his social withdrawal and vulnerability to extremist ideologies.

 

  1. Long-term Unemployment Intervention:

– Andersson’s lack of taxable income since 2014 should have triggered targeted job placement and training programs. The prolonged unemployment likely contributed significantly to his sense of alienation and search for alternative sources of meaning.

 

  1. Social Integration Programs:

– As Andersson became increasingly isolated, described as a “recluse” and “loner,” there were no apparent community-based programs to engage socially isolated individuals. Support groups or community outreach initiatives could have maintained social connections and prevented long-term isolation.

 

  1. Monitoring of Online Activities:

– While specific information about Andersson’s involvement with extremist networks is not available, authorities missed the opportunity to implement digital literacy programs or online intervention strategies that could have identified and addressed potential radicalization in digital spaces.

 

  1. Firearm Ownership Review:

– Despite Andersson’s mental health issues and long-term unemployment, his legal ownership of multiple hunting rifles was not reassessed. Regular check-ins or reassessments for firearm license holders could have flagged potential risks.

 

  1. Follow-up on Military Service Rejections:

– Andersson’s repeated rejections from military service were not followed up with alternative paths for civic engagement or purpose. This missed opportunity could have provided him with a sense of belonging and contribution to society.

 

  1. Meaning-Making Interventions:

– There was a lack of programs designed to help individuals like Andersson find positive sources of meaning and significance in their lives. Community projects or initiatives that allow individuals to contribute meaningfully to society could have fostered a sense of purpose and belonging.

 

  1. Cultural Integration Support:

– Given the changing demographics in Sweden and the rise of right-wing populism, authorities missed the opportunity to implement targeted programs addressing cultural anxieties and promoting intercultural understanding in Andersson’s community.

These missed opportunities highlight the importance of a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to preventing radicalization. By addressing individual, social, and societal factors contributing to extremism, authorities could have potentially interrupted Andersson’s path to radicalization at various stages. The MOSAIC model emphasizes the need for early identification of risk factors combined with targeted interventions and support systems to reduce the likelihood of individuals turning to extremism as a means of finding meaning and significance in their lives.

 

The Non-Uniqueness of Andersson’s Case: A Broader Perspective on Radicalization in Nordic Countries

While Rickard Andersson’s case is deeply troubling, it is important to recognize that his radicalization process follows patterns that are, unfortunately, not unique. The MOSAIC model reveals that Andersson’s journey towards extremism aligns with predictable patterns observed in other cases of radicalization, both in Sweden and globally.

 

Commonalities with Other Extremist Cases

  1. Quest for Significance: Like many other extremists, Andersson’s radicalization was driven by a fundamental need for personal significance and meaning (Kruglanski et al., 2019). His academic failures, long-term unemployment, and social isolation created a fertile ground for extremist ideologies that promised a sense of purpose and importance.
  2. Gradual Progression: Andersson’s radicalization followed the typical phases outlined in the MOSAIC model, from initial meaning foundations through to extremist outcomes. This gradual progression is a common feature in many radicalization cases, highlighting the importance of early intervention (Vos, 2023).
  3. Online Radicalization: While specific details of Andersson’s online activities are not available, the role of internet communities in fostering extremist beliefs is a well-documented trend in modern radicalization processes (Koehler, 2022).
  4. Response to Societal Changes: Andersson’s apparent resentment towards societal changes, particularly related to immigration and cultural shifts, mirrors broader trends of right-wing extremism in Nordic countries (Rydgren & van der Meiden, 2019).

 

Broader Trends in Nordic Countries

Andersson’s case connects to wider patterns of radicalization and violence in Nordic societies:

  1. Rise in Far-Right Extremism: Sweden and other Nordic countries have seen an increase in far-right extremist activities, often fueled by anti-immigration sentiments and perceived threats to national identity (Ravndal, 2018).
  2. Gang-Related Violence: While Andersson’s case is not directly related to gang culture, the increase in gang-related shootings in Sweden points to a broader issue of marginalized individuals seeking belonging and significance through violent means (Sturup et al., 2019).
  3. Lone-Actor Terrorism: Andersson’s attack fits into a concerning trend of lone-actor terrorism in Nordic countries, where individuals radicalize and plan attacks without direct organizational support (Schuurman et al., 2019).

 

Societal Factors Contributing to Radicalization Risk

The broader problems mentioned in research on meaning in life help explain why there may be many potential “Rickard Anderssons” in Nordic society:

  1. Lack of Meaning-Oriented Education: Educational systems often focus on academic and vocational skills without adequately addressing students’ need for meaning and purpose, leaving individuals like Andersson vulnerable to extremist narratives (Vos, 2023).
  2. Decline of Meaning-Centered Communities: The erosion of traditional community structures and the rise of individualism have left many without strong social support networks or shared sources of meaning (Martela & Steger, 2016).
  3. Intergenerational Disconnection: Secularization and rapid societal changes have disrupted the transmission of intergenerational meanings, leaving some individuals struggling to find their place in society (Vos, 2023, 2020).
  4. Increased Societal Complexities: Globalization and technological advancements have created a more complex world, making it challenging for some individuals to navigate and find a sense of belonging (Kruglanski et al., 2019).
  5. Economic Pressures: Issues such as decreasing social mobility and the phenomenon of “generation rent” create economic stress and uncertainty, potentially fueling resentment and vulnerability to extremist ideologies (Standing, 2011).
  6. Impact of Crises: Economic downturns, pandemics, and other societal crises can exacerbate feelings of powerlessness and loss of meaning, creating conditions ripe for radicalization (Kruglanski et al., 2022).

 

Conclusion: A Call for Comprehensive Approaches

Rickard Andersson’s case, while deeply tragic, is unfortunately not an isolated incident. It reflects broader trends of radicalization and extremism that stem from complex societal issues. The predictability of his radicalization process, as illuminated by the MOSAIC model, underscores the urgent need for comprehensive, society-wide approaches to addressing the root causes of extremism. By recognizing that Andersson’s case is part of a larger pattern, policymakers can develop more effective, holistic strategies to prevent radicalization and build more resilient, inclusive societies. The challenge lies not just in addressing individual cases, but in creating societal conditions where fewer individuals feel compelled to seek meaning and significance through extremist ideologies and violent actions.

 

Implications and Recommendations

 

Introduction

The tragic case of Rickard Andersson, culminating in the mass shooting at Campus Risbergska in Örebro, Sweden, on February 4, 2025, serves as a stark reminder of the critical need for effective radicalization prevention strategies. This comprehensive analysis explores the implications of Andersson’s case, focusing on how authorities can improve their models for identifying individuals at risk, the role of government policies, and the crucial importance of meaning-oriented education in preventing radicalization. By examining this case through the lens of the MOSAIC (Meaning-Oriented Social And Individual Change) model, we can derive valuable insights and recommendations for countering violent extremism.

 

Indications of Radicalization: Lessons from Andersson’s Case

 

  1. Narrowing Meaning Types

In Andersson’s case, we observed a clear focus on abstract types of meaning, dismissing self-oriented, hedonistic, and materialistic types. His fixation on perceived societal injustices and cultural threats indicates a narrowing of his sources of meaning.

Recommendation: Develop programs that encourage individuals to maintain a diverse range of meaning types, including personal growth, relationships, and everyday pleasures.

 

  1. Abstract Ideals Focus

Andersson’s radicalization process centered around abstract ideology, particularly related to anti-immigration sentiments and cultural preservation.

Recommendation: Provide alternative sources of meaning that are concrete and personally relevant, such as community service projects or skill development programs.

 

  1. Increased Search for Social Meanings in Extremist Groups

While Andersson was described as a “loner,” his radicalization likely involved seeking social connection through online extremist communities.

Recommendation: Create inclusive social programs that provide healthy alternatives for individuals seeking belonging and social identity.

 

  1. Decline in Critical Thinking and Intuitive Understanding

Andersson’s embrace of extremist ideologies suggests a reduced capacity for critical thinking and nuanced understanding of complex social issues.

Recommendation: Implement educational programs that foster critical thinking skills and media literacy from an early age.

 

  1. Rigid Conformism or Focus on Traditions to Find Meaning

Andersson’s attachment to a narrow view of Swedish culture and identity indicates a rigid approach to finding meaning through tradition.

Recommendation: Promote flexible and inclusive interpretations of cultural traditions that allow for adaptation and diversity.

 

  1. Goal-Oriented Focus

Andersson’s meticulous planning of the attack demonstrates a goal-oriented focus aligned with extremist ideals.

Recommendation: Provide alternative goal-setting frameworks that channel individuals’ drive towards constructive personal and community objectives.

 

  1. Increased Radical Engagement

While specific details are limited, Andersson’s progression to violent action suggests increased engagement with extremist ideas over time.

Recommendation: Develop early intervention programs that can identify and address signs of growing radical engagement.

 

  1. Persistent Unfulfilled Meanings

Andersson’s long-term unemployment and social isolation point to persistent unfulfilled meanings in his life.

Recommendation: Create support systems that help individuals find fulfillment through various life domains, including career counseling and social integration programs.

 

  1. Decline in Self-Oriented Meanings

Andersson’s case suggests a decline in self-care and personal development as he became more focused on abstract ideological goals.

Recommendation: Promote self-care, personal growth, and individual well-being as essential components of a meaningful life.

 

  1. Unstable Meaning-Making

Andersson’s radical shift from social withdrawal to violent action indicates unstable meaning-making processes.

Recommendation: Offer guidance and support for developing stable, positive sources of meaning that can withstand life challenges.

 

  1. Rapid Radicalization Progression

While Andersson’s radicalization likely occurred over time, the final progression to violence may have been rapid.

Recommendation: Enhance monitoring systems to detect sudden changes in behavior or ideology that may indicate accelerated radicalization.

 

  1. Increased Resistance

Andersson’s actions suggest a strong resistance to alternative perspectives that could have challenged his extremist views.

Recommendation: Develop dialogue-based interventions that gently introduce alternative viewpoints without triggering defensive reactions.

 

Recommendations for Meaning-Oriented Programs

  1. Realize Multiple Examples of Meaning

Andersson’s narrow focus on abstract ideological meanings highlights the need for diverse examples of life’s purpose.

Recommendation: Implement educational programs that expose individuals to at least six different examples of meaning in life, ranging from personal achievements to community contributions.

 

  1. Have Examples of Various Types of Meaning

Andersson’s case demonstrates the dangers of fixating on a single type of meaning.

Recommendation: Develop curricula that include materialistic, hedonistic, self-oriented, social, and existential-philosophical examples of meaning to provide a well-rounded perspective.

 

  1. Focus on Social & Self-Oriented Types

Andersson’s isolation and lack of positive social connections contributed to his vulnerability to extremist ideologies.

Recommendation: Create programs that emphasize connections, community, altruism, self-esteem, and self-expression to build resilience against radicalization.

 

  1. Develop Skills to Respond Flexibly to Challenges

Andersson’s inability to cope with academic failures and unemployment in constructive ways points to a lack of adaptive coping skills.

Recommendation: Teach adaptive coping strategies, including envisioning alternative meanings and situation reappraisal techniques, particularly during the pre-radicalization and early-radicalization phases.

 

  1. Foster Critical-Intuitive Approach

Andersson’s embrace of simplistic extremist narratives suggests a lack of critical thinking skills.

Recommendation: Implement educational programs that teach intuition listening, critical thinking, and reflexivity to enhance individuals’ ability to navigate complex social issues.

 

  1. Enhance Self-Awareness

Andersson’s case indicates a lack of insight into his own dissatisfactions and frustrations.

Recommendation: Develop programs that help individuals recognize and address their unmet needs and frustrations in healthy ways.

 

  1. Improve Emotion Regulation

Andersson’s violent outburst suggests poor emotion regulation skills.

Recommendation: Offer training in frustration tolerance, gratification postponement, and emotional appraisal to help individuals manage intense emotions without resorting to extremism.

 

  1. Identify Radicalization Signs

The failure to recognize Andersson’s progression towards extremism highlights the need for better awareness of radicalization indicators.

Recommendation: Train community members, educators, and mental health professionals to analyze potential indicators of extremist outcomes.

 

  1. Address Underlying Meaning-Related Needs

Andersson’s case demonstrates how unmet needs for belonging and significance can drive individuals towards extremism.

Recommendation: Develop programs that fulfill meaning-related needs in non-extremist ways, such as community service initiatives or mentorship programs.

 

  1. Diversify Meaning Types

Andersson’s fixation on abstract ideals underscores the importance of a balanced approach to meaning.

Recommendation: Create interventions that balance abstract ideals with examples of self-oriented, hedonistic, and materialistic meanings, or promote social meanings in non-extremist groups.

 

Recommendations for Meaning-Centered Governmental Policies

  1. Enhance Government Effectiveness

Andersson’s disillusionment with society suggests a lack of trust in governmental institutions.

Recommendation: Implement policies that build public trust and reduce perceived meaning discrepancies, such as transparent communication initiatives and responsive public services.

 

  1. Reduce Income Inequality

Andersson’s long-term unemployment likely contributed to his sense of alienation and resentment.

Recommendation: Develop policies that improve economic opportunities for marginalized groups, including job creation programs and progressive taxation.

 

  1. Develop Social Integration Programs

Andersson’s isolation highlights the need for better social integration initiatives.

Recommendation: Create programs that foster belonging and reduce fragmentation for minorities, such as community-based cultural exchange events.

 

  1. Implement Comprehensive Education

Andersson’s academic struggles and subsequent attack on an educational institution underscore the importance of effective, inclusive education.

Recommendation: Reform educational systems to promote critical thinking, diverse perspectives, and intercultural understanding from an early age.

 

  1. Support Community-Based Programs

The lack of community intervention in Andersson’s case points to the need for stronger local support systems.

Recommendation: Fund and promote community-based programs that provide alternative sources of meaning and social connection.

 

  1. Improve Mental Health Services

Andersson’s reported mental health issues suggest a gap in mental health support.

Recommendation: Expand access to mental health services, with a focus on trauma support for at-risk individuals.

 

  1. Reduce Structural Discrimination

Andersson’s resentment towards societal changes may have been fueled by perceived discrimination.

Recommendation: Implement policies that promote equal opportunities in employment, education, and services for all members of society.

 

  1. Develop Media Literacy Programs

Andersson’s susceptibility to extremist narratives indicates a need for better media literacy.

Recommendation: Create comprehensive media literacy programs to combat online radicalization and promote responsible social media use.

 

  1. Invest in Urban Planning

Andersson’s social isolation might have been exacerbated by urban design that doesn’t foster community interaction.

Recommendation: Develop urban planning strategies that reduce social isolation and promote diverse interactions within communities.

 

  1. Support Interfaith Dialogue

Andersson’s case highlights the need for better understanding between different cultural and religious groups.

Recommendation: Promote interfaith and intercultural dialogue initiatives to reduce intergroup tensions and foster mutual understanding.

 

  1. Implement Restorative Justice

The lack of alternative conflict resolution methods in Andersson’s case suggests a need for restorative justice approaches.

Recommendation: Develop restorative justice programs that address grievances and promote social healing in affected communities.

 

  1. Develop Early Intervention Programs

The failure to intervene early in Andersson’s radicalization process underscores the need for proactive measures.

Recommendation: Establish early intervention programs to identify and support individuals at risk of radicalization before they progress to violent extremism.

 

  1. Support Civil Society Organizations

The absence of strong civil society engagement in Andersson’s case indicates a missed opportunity for prevention.

Recommendation: Provide support and resources to civil society organizations that offer diverse avenues for civic engagement and meaning-making.

 

  1. Protect Press Freedom

The role of media narratives in shaping Andersson’s worldview highlights the importance of a free and responsible press.

Recommendation: Safeguard press freedom while promoting responsible journalism that presents diverse perspectives on social issues.

 

  1. Develop National CVE Strategies

Andersson’s case reveals the need for comprehensive, national-level approaches to countering violent extremism.

Recommendation: Develop multi-stakeholder national strategies that address the root causes of radicalization through coordinated efforts across various sectors of society.

 

Conclusion

The tragic case of Rickard Andersson serves as a powerful call to action for implementing comprehensive, meaning-oriented approaches to preventing radicalization and violent extremism. By adopting the recommendations derived from the MOSAIC model and applying them across educational, community, and governmental domains, we can work towards creating societies that are more resilient to extremist ideologies and more fulfilling for all their members.

The key to success lies in addressing the fundamental human need for meaning and significance in constructive ways. By providing diverse sources of meaning, fostering critical thinking, promoting social integration, and addressing systemic inequalities, we can create an environment where individuals like Andersson are less likely to turn to extremism as a means of finding purpose and belonging.

As we move forward, it is crucial that policymakers, educators, mental health professionals, and community leaders work together to implement these strategies. The lessons learned from Andersson’s case, viewed through the lens of the MOSAIC model, offer a roadmap for building a more inclusive, understanding, and meaningful society – one that can effectively counter the appeal of extremist ideologies and prevent future tragedies.

 

References

ACLED. (2024). Annual Report on Global Conflict Trends.

Aftonbladet. (2025). Exclusive interview with Rickard Andersson’s relative.

Avaz.ba. (2025). Otkriven identitet napadača iz Švedske: Bio je izuzetno čudan.

BBC News. (2025). Sweden shooting: What do we know about the suspect?

Bhui, K., Everitt, B., & Jones, E. (2014). Might depression, psychosocial adversity, and limited social assets explain vulnerability to and resistance against violent radicalisation? PLoS One, 9(9), e105918.

Corner, E., & Gill, P. (2015). A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 23-34.

Expressen. (2025). Rickard Andersson: The path to extremism.

Global Activism Trends Institute. (2022). Youth Political Engagement Survey.

ISRD4. (2024). International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD4). Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, University of Helsinki.

ITV News. (2025). Sweden’s ‘worst mass shooting’ leaves at least 11 dead at adult education centre.

Koehler, D. (2022). Online radicalization: Myths and realities. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 45(1), 1-14.

Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The three pillars of radicalization: Needs, narratives, and networks. Oxford University Press.

Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531-545.

National Gang Center. (2024). National Youth Gang Survey Analysis. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.

OECD. (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. OECD Publishing.

Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257-301.

Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 115-144.

Price Waterhouse Coopers PwC. (2024). The Global Youth Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/publications/the-global-youth-outlook.html

Ravndal, J. A. (2018). Right-wing terrorism and violence in Western Europe: Introducing the RTV dataset. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(6), 1-15.

Rydgren, J., & van der Meiden, S. (2019). The radical right and the end of Swedish exceptionalism. European Political Science, 18(3), 439-455.

Schuurman, B., Lindekilde, L., Malthaner, S., O’Connor, F., Gill, P., & Bouhana, N. (2019). End of the lone wolf: The typology that should not have been. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42(8), 771-778.

Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.

Sturup, J., Rostami, A., Mondani, H., Gerell, M., Sarnecki, J., & Edling, C. (2019). Increased gun violence among young males in Sweden: a Descriptive National Survey and International Comparison. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25(4), 365-378.

Svallfors, S. (2016). Politics as organised combat – New players and new rules of the game in Sweden. New Political Economy, 21(6), 505-519.

Swedish Police Authority. (2025). Official statement on the Örebro shooting.

SVT. (2025). Rickard Andersson: The path to extremism.

The Guardian. (2025). Shooter at Örebro school had taken classes there, reports Swedish media.

The Independent. (2025). Rickard Andersson: Who was the Sweden school shooting suspect.

TV2. (2025). Kilder til Aftonbladet: Massemorderen skånet enkelte.

Vos, J. (2020). The Economics of Meaning in Life. University Press of America.

Vos, J. (2021). The Psychology of COVID-19: Building Resilience for Future Pandemics. SAGE Publications.

Vos, J. (2022). Meaning in Life: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Practitioners. SAGE Publications.

Vos, J., & Namdar, C. (2025). The meaning of meaning in life in radicalization: A systematic literature review and preliminary validation of the Meaning-Oriented Social And Individual Change (MOSAIC) framework. (Writing in process.)

Vos, J., Roberts, R., & Davies, J. (2019). Mental Health in Crisis. SAGE Publications.

https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/dette-er-den-mistenkte-skytteren/82632131

 

From Aspiring Nun to Guerrilla Fighter: Tanja Nijmeijer’s Radical Quest for Meaning

Semi-journalistic text

Introduction

Tanja Nijmeijer’s life story is a compelling narrative of radicalization, illustrating how the search for meaning can lead an individual down unexpected paths. This analysis will explore her journey through the lens of the MOSAIC model, examining the phases of her radicalization process and the role that meaning-making played throughout her life.

 

Phase 1: Meaning foundations (Pre-radicalization)

Early Life and Upbringing

Tanja Nijmeijer was born on February 13, 1978, in Denekamp, a small town in the eastern Netherlands near the German border. Growing up in a middle-class Catholic family, Nijmeijer’s early life was characterized by comfort and stability. This background is crucial to understanding her later choices, as it provided her with a sense of security that allowed for introspection and ideological exploration.

Her upbringing in a Catholic household initially shaped her approach to meaning. As a child, she dreamed of becoming a nun, indicating an early inclination towards a life of service and dedication to a higher purpose. This suggests that from a young age, Nijmeijer was seeking meaning beyond the material comforts of her middle-class existence.

 

Education and Early Worldview

Nijmeijer’s education played a significant role in shaping her worldview. She studied Romance languages and cultures at the University of Groningen, an experience that likely broadened her perspectives and exposed her to diverse ideas. During her university years, she transitioned from her Catholic upbringing to becoming what she described as a “diehard atheist.” This shift represents a critical re-envisioning of meaning in her life, moving from a religious framework to a secular one.

The transition from religious belief to atheism is a significant example of meaning reappraisal. It suggests that Nijmeijer was actively questioning the foundations of her worldview and seeking new sources of meaning. This process of questioning and searching would become a recurring theme in her life.

 

Phase 2: Meaning search (Initial exposure and explorations)

Societal factors

While we don’t have specific information about personal experiences of injustice in Nijmeijer’s early life, her later actions suggest a heightened sensitivity to societal inequalities. This sensitivity may have roots in her upbringing or education, possibly influenced by:

  1. The Dutch education system, known for emphasizing global awareness and social responsibility.
  2. Exposure to leftist or socialist ideas during her university years.
  3. Possible volunteer work or social activism during her youth, though this is speculative.

Her later rapid radicalization upon exposure to Colombian poverty indicates that she likely had a pre-existing framework for understanding and responding to social injustice, even if she hadn’t directly experienced significant personal hardships.

 

First Encounter with Colombia (1998)

Nijmeijer’s first visit to Colombia in 1998 as a 20-year-old student marked the beginning of her self-identification with the country’s social struggles. This experience was pivotal in her radicalization process, representing a significant meaning discrepancy between her previously held worldview and the reality she encountered.

Her reaction to witnessing poverty in Colombia is telling: “I saw the poverty and I was really impressed by that. I started to question the capitalist system, everything around me.” This statement illustrates a profound reappraisal of her understanding of global economic systems and social justice.

During this phase, Nijmeijer’s approach to meaning appears to have shifted from a more self-oriented focus (typical of her middle-class upbringing) to a social-oriented approach. She began to find meaning in understanding and potentially addressing societal inequalities.

 

Return to the Netherlands and Continued Reflection

After her initial visit to Colombia, Nijmeijer returned to the Netherlands to continue her studies. This period likely involved intense reflection and meaning-making as she tried to reconcile her experiences in Colombia with her life in the Netherlands. She may have engaged in various activities to maintain her connection to the issues she encountered:

  1. Further study of Colombian history and politics
  2. Involvement in social justice or anti-capitalist groups in the Netherlands
  3. Maintaining contact with people she met in Colombia

This phase demonstrates the iterative nature of meaning-making. Nijmeijer was likely constantly re-evaluating her beliefs and values in light of her experiences, seeking ways to align her actions with her evolving worldview.

 

Phase 3: Meaning immersion (Engagement with radical network)

Return to Colombia (2002)

Nijmeijer’s decision to return to Colombia in 2002 marks the beginning of her indoctrination phase. At this point, her search for meaning had led her to actively seek involvement in Colombia’s social and political struggles. This decision represents a significant step in narrowing her focus on a specific ideological path.

 

Radicalization through Personal Connections

A crucial element in Nijmeijer’s radicalization was her relationship with a fellow teacher who later revealed himself as a FARC militant. This individual played a key role in her indoctrination process, taking her to city slums and framing FARC’s fight as a struggle for “social justice” in a country of deep inequalities.

This period illustrates the power of personal connections in the radicalization process. The FARC member provided Nijmeijer with a narrative that aligned with her evolving worldview, offering a concrete path to address the injustices she had observed. This narrative likely resonated strongly with her search for meaning, providing a sense of purpose and a way to act on her beliefs.

 

Narrowing of Meaning Sources

During this phase, we see a narrowing of Nijmeijer’s sources of meaning. Her focus increasingly centered on the social and abstract meanings found within the FARC’s ideology. This narrowing is characteristic of the radicalization process, where complex global issues are often reduced to simpler, more absolute narratives.

Nijmeijer’s approach to meaning during this time likely became more traditional-conformist and goal-oriented. The FARC’s clear ideology and mission provided a structured framework for understanding the world and her place in it.

 

Phase 4: Meaning commitment (Solidification of radical narrative)

Joining FARC (2002)

Nijmeijer’s decision to officially join FARC in November 2002 marks her entry into the militantization phase. This choice represents the culmination of her radicalization process and a full commitment to violent extremism as a means of pursuing her ideological goals.

Her statement, “I didn’t choose to use violence, I chose to do politics in a country where doing politics implies violence,” reveals her justification for this drastic step. This rationalization demonstrates how Nijmeijer had reappraised the use of violence, viewing it as a necessary tool for achieving social change.

 

Phase 4: Violent Extremism

Life as a FARC Guerrilla

As a FARC member, Nijmeijer’s life changed dramatically. She adopted the nom de guerre “Alexandra Nariño” and immersed herself in guerrilla life. This period was characterized by:

  1. Physical hardships: Long marches through jungles, constant threat of military raids
  2. Ideological reinforcement: Continuous exposure to FARC’s doctrines and narratives
  3. Violent activities: Involvement in bombings and other militant actions

Nijmeijer’s diary, discovered in 2007, provides insights into her mental state during this period. It revealed both her commitment to the cause and moments of doubt, illustrating the ongoing process of meaning-making even within the confines of a radical organization.

 

Meaning-Making in Extremism

During this phase, Nijmeijer’s approach to meaning became heavily influenced by FARC’s ideology. Her sources of meaning narrowed further, primarily revolving around the group’s goals and her role within it. However, her diary entries suggest that she continued to grapple with meaning discrepancies, questioning the alignment between FARC’s stated ideals and the realities of guerrilla life.

 

Phase 6: Return to non-violent meaning-making

Involvement in Peace Talks (2012)

A significant shift in Nijmeijer’s journey occurred when she was named as a member of the FARC delegation in peace negotiations with the Colombian government in 2012. This transition from militant to peace negotiator represents a crucial point in her ongoing search for meaning.

 

Factors Enabling the Shift

Several factors may have contributed to Nijmeijer’s ability to transition from violent extremist to peace negotiator:

  1. Changing political landscape: The weakening of FARC’s military position and increasing international pressure for peace.
  2. Personal growth and reflection: Years of experience in FARC may have led to a more nuanced understanding of the conflict and potential solutions.
  3. Exposure to diverse perspectives: Interaction with hostages, including American contractors, may have broadened her viewpoint.
  4. Desire for change: Possible fatigue from the hardships of guerrilla life and a desire to find new ways to pursue her ideals.

 

Reappraisal and Re-envisioning of Meaning

This shift required a significant reappraisal of Nijmeijer’s approach to achieving social change. It demonstrates her ability to re-envision meaning, moving from a strictly militant approach to one that embraces dialogue and negotiation. This transition suggests a return to a more critical-intuitive approach to meaning, where she could engage with complex ideas and contradictions rather than adhering to a rigid ideological framework.

 

Conclusion: A Continuous Search for Meaning

Tanja Nijmeijer’s life story, from her comfortable upbringing in the Netherlands to her role as a FARC guerrilla and later as a peace negotiator, can be framed as a continuous search for meaning. Throughout each phase of her journey, we see recurring themes:

  1. A persistent desire to address social injustice
  2. An ongoing process of questioning and reappraising her beliefs and actions
  3. A willingness to make dramatic life changes in pursuit of her ideals

Her journey illustrates the complex interplay between individual meaning-making and the broader social and political context. It demonstrates how the search for meaning can lead individuals down unexpected and sometimes extreme paths, but also how it can evolve and transform over time.

Nijmeijer’s story serves as a powerful example of the role of meaning in the radicalization process, as well as in the potential for deradicalization and reconciliation. It underscores the importance of understanding the underlying motivations and meaning-making processes of individuals involved in extremist movements, offering valuable insights for prevention and intervention strategies.

Please visit Appearance->Widgets to add your widgets here